alevortix.blogg.se

Modern combat 3 1.1.2
Modern combat 3 1.1.2











modern combat 3 1.1.2

  • Improve the Alliance’s practical cooperation at all levels with partners, the UN and other relevant international organizations, governmental and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), contractors, commercial partners and local actors when planning and conducting operations.
  • Improve the coherent application of the Alliance’s own crisis management instruments, including its military and political planning procedures.
  • In this context, there are three goals to NATO’s contribution to a comprehensive approach: The focus of NATO is upon the collaborative role for better understanding, informing and working with partner nations 2 and non-NATO-entities. NATOs contribution to a comprehensive approach

    modern combat 3 1.1.2

    Thus, comprehensive approach is a mind-set aiming for synergies by coordinating or at least de-conflicting political, humanitarian, development and security efforts.

    modern combat 3 1.1.2

    Rather, NATO encourages all responders to a crisis to participate within a comprehensive approach for improving the overall success of the international community’s mission. Moreover, NATO decided to not develop and publish any definition on what comprehensive approach exactly is, not to claim ownership.

    modern combat 3 1.1.2

    Different operational circumstances will ultimately affect non-military actors’ procedures in working with the military 1. Furthermore, this phrasing suggests flexibility in its characteristics instead of a standardized blueprint. Therefore it is also better to speak of “a” comprehensive approach instead of “the” comprehensive approach. In this sense institutional familiarity and information sharing are the key.Ĭomprehensive approach can be understood as a concept, philosophy or mind-set rather than a documented process or capability. The Alliance also stresses the value of collaborative working based upon mutual trust and a willingness to cooperate. There is the importance for shared understanding engendered through cooperative working, liaison, education and common language. Sometimes local actors can have more power than the formal leaders. This should include working with international and indigenous local authorities and other non-military actors. A successful resolution to the conflict will depend on a mutual understanding of both the military’s and the non-military actors’ purpose, resolve, capabilities, and motivation.Īt all levels, including the tactical one, NATO commanders must be empowered to conduct effective cooperation and coordination to execute operations. It is important for the military to recognize that sometimes non-military actors may not always support the military. However, it requires a strong trust between all parties to make this approach possible. A comprehensive political, civilian, and military approach is necessary to effectively manage today’s complex crises. Crisis management requirements have expanded in terms of duration, tasks carried out, actors involved, complexity and multitude of factors (social, economic, environmental…).Īchieving acceptable and sustainable solutions requires capabilities that the military alone cannot provide. The operating environment involves complex and interlinked areas such as ethnic, religious, ideological and technological issues. Modern crises and conflicts are often not related to the military and therefore require assistance from outside the military. NATO recognises that the military cannot resolve crisis or conflict by itself. NATO and a comprehensive approach selected for printing Comprehensive approach













    Modern combat 3 1.1.2